<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Missile countermeasures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.legacyworlds.com/index.php/2008-03-04/missile-countermeasures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.legacyworlds.com/index.php/2008-03-04/missile-countermeasures/</link>
	<description>Updates on the new version&#039;s design and progress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 22:05:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TSeeker</title>
		<link>http://blog.legacyworlds.com/index.php/2008-03-04/missile-countermeasures/comment-page-1/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>TSeeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.legacyworlds.com/index.php/2008-03-04/missile-countermeasures/#comment-571</guid>
		<description>That would still unbalance the system. The idea behind the whole &quot;3 types of weapons vs 3 types of defences&quot; thing is to make sure players have to adapt their fleets as they fight. If one of the weapon types becomes useless (or at least not as efficient) while the majority of the enemy fleet is not actually equipped with the correct type of defences, then this system becomes pointless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would still unbalance the system. The idea behind the whole &#8220;3 types of weapons vs 3 types of defences&#8221; thing is to make sure players have to adapt their fleets as they fight. If one of the weapon types becomes useless (or at least not as efficient) while the majority of the enemy fleet is not actually equipped with the correct type of defences, then this system becomes pointless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Absolutis</title>
		<link>http://blog.legacyworlds.com/index.php/2008-03-04/missile-countermeasures/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Absolutis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 04:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.legacyworlds.com/index.php/2008-03-04/missile-countermeasures/#comment-566</guid>
		<description>Maybe 2 types of ship missile countermeasures: ones that protect the whole fleet and ones who protect only the ship?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe 2 types of ship missile countermeasures: ones that protect the whole fleet and ones who protect only the ship?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TSeeker</title>
		<link>http://blog.legacyworlds.com/index.php/2008-03-04/missile-countermeasures/comment-page-1/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>TSeeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 07:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.legacyworlds.com/index.php/2008-03-04/missile-countermeasures/#comment-558</guid>
		<description>No, they will not. It would be pretty pointless as that would unbalance the whole system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, they will not. It would be pretty pointless as that would unbalance the whole system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Absolutis</title>
		<link>http://blog.legacyworlds.com/index.php/2008-03-04/missile-countermeasures/comment-page-1/#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator>Absolutis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 05:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.legacyworlds.com/index.php/2008-03-04/missile-countermeasures/#comment-557</guid>
		<description>By the way, will a ship&#039;s missile countermeasures protect the whole fleet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, will a ship&#8217;s missile countermeasures protect the whole fleet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ju</title>
		<link>http://blog.legacyworlds.com/index.php/2008-03-04/missile-countermeasures/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>ju</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.legacyworlds.com/index.php/2008-03-04/missile-countermeasures/#comment-175</guid>
		<description>The principle being the same, the same kind of counter measures can be imagined, but of course with different names and characteristics, since the item to intercept is different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The principle being the same, the same kind of counter measures can be imagined, but of course with different names and characteristics, since the item to intercept is different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lemorsa</title>
		<link>http://blog.legacyworlds.com/index.php/2008-03-04/missile-countermeasures/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Lemorsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 22:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.legacyworlds.com/index.php/2008-03-04/missile-countermeasures/#comment-171</guid>
		<description>I think that these same ideas to protect a ship could be used against IPBM&#039;s. Personally i think they sound pretty good. Kamikaze missiles for specific accuracy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that these same ideas to protect a ship could be used against IPBM&#8217;s. Personally i think they sound pretty good. Kamikaze missiles for specific accuracy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

